Difference between revisions of "Talk:Knights of Erzoth"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | You aren't "founded" officially until you're on the map. ~ Rasheab | + | 1. You aren't "founded" officially as a country until you're on the map. ~ Rasheab |
| + | *but in the grand scheme of things, not that big of a deal. | ||
2. Please use the "minor edit" button, and the "preview" button liberally. | 2. Please use the "minor edit" button, and the "preview" button liberally. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | "Please don't make up events that can't be reconciled with game history or existing lore." [[Editing Help]]<br> | ||
| + | *Alliance was active in early March<br> | ||
| + | *you guys participated in the event in late March<br> | ||
| + | *Alliance wasn't declared defunct till May. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Additionally, Alliance members will reappear from time to time, so I would suggest working out a history that can be reconciled with that. (In the IC thread you seem to be setting up a country post-cataclysm; that can be reconciled with Alliance showing up later, unlike (in my opinion) the abandonment direction.) | ||
Revision as of 03:42, 15 May 2013
1. You aren't "founded" officially as a country until you're on the map. ~ Rasheab
- but in the grand scheme of things, not that big of a deal.
2. Please use the "minor edit" button, and the "preview" button liberally.
"Please don't make up events that can't be reconciled with game history or existing lore." Editing Help
- Alliance was active in early March
- you guys participated in the event in late March
- Alliance wasn't declared defunct till May.
Additionally, Alliance members will reappear from time to time, so I would suggest working out a history that can be reconciled with that. (In the IC thread you seem to be setting up a country post-cataclysm; that can be reconciled with Alliance showing up later, unlike (in my opinion) the abandonment direction.)